Some Never Come Home; Some Never Move Past

Pinnacle Presbyterian Church, Chapel Library

25150 N Pima Rd

Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Tel. 480-585-9448 x 1

Some Never Come Home; Some Never Move Past

Trapped in horrific memories that refuse to fade. Closed off. Fearful in an endless war with themselves. Unless you’ve been there yourself it’s almost impossible to comprehend the debilitating curse of Post-Traumatic-Stress.

These are the people who fought and sacrificed for us. They were our shield against adversity and the defenders of our beliefs and values. This will be powerful and it will touch you emotionally. Ultimately it is about us all and the way we deal with the world around us. Be prepared …

The program:

September 7  |  7:00 pm – 9:00 pm   |  Chapel Library    

Post-Traumatic-Stress from Perspectives of Science and Faith

Panel Discussion: Dr. Barry Goodfield, Mr. Joe Brett, Rev. Dr. Wesley Avram

September 14  |  7:00 pm – 9:00 pm  |  Chapel Library  

PTSD – The Roots of Despair 

Lecture, video demonstration with group discussion

September 21  |  7:00 pm – 9:00 pm  |  Chapel Library  

PTSD and Our Unconscious Mind

Lecture, video demonstration with group discussion

September 28  |  7:00 pm – 9:00 pm  Chapel Library  

PTSD The Tools to Find The Long Road Home  

Lecture, video demonstration with group discussion http://

Professional tips: How to Save More Vets from Suicide

The following presents a review of an article written by Dr. Peter Gutierrez and Dr. Natalie Riblet, written by Dr. Barry Austin Goodfield, DABFM, founder of Operation New Outlook.

The reviewed article appeared in VA Research Currents; Research news from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (May 2017 issue). The article’s title: “Studies Probe Pre-Suicide Contact with Mental Health Care Among Vets, Soldiers”

Dr. Natalie Riblet, a psychiatrist at the White River Junction VA Medical Center in Vermont, led the study relating to Veteran suicides. She spoke about why a recent psychiatric hospitalization may be a risk factor for suicide.

Dr. Peter Gutierrez, a clinical research psychologist at the VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, co-authored the other study, which relies on data from Army STARRS, the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Service Members.

The study, published in April 2017 in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, looks at 569 Army soldiers who died by suicide from 2004 to 2009. It says about 50 percent of the soldiers accessed health care in the month before their death and about 25 percent in the week prior. Most of those visits were in a mental health unit.

“This suggests that opportunities exist to intervene with a substantial proportion of suicide decedents in the months before death by focusing on patients in [mental health] treatment,”

Gutierrez explains that health providers carry a burden to be aware of which of their patients are at risk based on factors that typically don’t change much: age, gender, and prior history of suicide-related behaviors. When providers sense an elevated risk of suicide, he says, they should routinely ask their patients about thoughts of suicide, preparation for a suicide attempt, and level of intent to engage in self-harm.

Gutierrez says there are other warning signs health providers should monitor:

  • Significant agitation. “That often manifests as a dramatic change in quality of sleep, and it’s something that’s pretty easy to ask about. How have you been sleeping this week? Have you been having trouble falling asleep and staying asleep? Are you waking up too early? Does this represent a dramatic change in how you were sleeping in the last month?”
  • A dramatic increase or decrease in alcohol and substance abuse. “At an international meeting I attended,” says Gutierrez, “data were presented that suggests a huge percentage of chronic problem drinkers who die by suicide quit drinking entirely or dramatically decrease how much they drink about 48 hours before their suicide. That’s a pretty narrow window, but it suggests that assessing for major changes in substance abuse is important.”
  • Social withdrawal. “Asking about social withdrawal, which is a dramatic change to the extent in which people are socializing over the past month, may well be a warning sign. Seriously pondering the probability of ending one’s own life is incredibly daunting, and in order to sort of focus the necessary attention to make it possible, many people withdraw.”
  • Eye blinking. “It appears that when suicide is imminent, the rate at which people blink their eyes lengthens dramatically. Most people blink every three seconds or so. That may extend to every 25 or 30 seconds for a person considering suicide. I wouldn’t say this is necessarily a warning sign at this point. But we definitely need to study this more.”

Doctor Goodfield’s observations:

We know that elevated flutter rate or eye blinking quickly is an indicator of anxiety. The faster the flutter rate the greater the anxiety. Conversely, It can be said the slower the flutter rate or eye blinking the more the individual is in an altered state of consciousness. They are physically present but psychologically absent. This person is in a trance state, That is, they may appear to be lost in thought or simply not paying attention to what is being said and what is happening around them. They are lost in the thought of life versus death when deliberating the issue of suicide, period.

This is not to say that people who are ”away,” or daydreaming, or lost in thought are suicidal.  What is suggested, however, is that people seriously considering suicide are more involved with thoughts from the past and considerations of their bleak future.

Their fears from the past get projected into the future and wipe out involvement and commitment to the needs and the demands of the environment here and now. They’re simply not home.

What would we expect to see nonverbally with individuals in this state?

  • Eyes with white showing below the iris. This look strongly reflects an individual absent from being present. This is one of the indicators used by clinicians doing hypnosis to evaluate the subject’s susceptibility to trance induction. The more white showing under the eyes, the more likely one can infer that this is a subject who is not only hypnotizable, but is in an altered state much of the time. This is an important variable for the clinician concerned about suicidal ideations.
  • Eyes with a glazed look about them. Once again, the clinician should be looking for the degree to which the veteran appears to be present and responsive to the questions and activities going on around him or her. It is safe to say, with regard to suicide, the more absent the patient, the greater the risk.
  • Eyes that are moist as if they have or are about to cry. Moist eyes or eyes that appear shiny may reflect recent crying and or sadness where the patient tried to hold back his or her tears. A “stiff upper lip” attitude does not guarantee that that which is held back is not observable. This is particularly true when looking at the eyes of a patient on the edge of life or death.

Gutierrez’s study doesn’t specifically look at what would drive a soldier to die by suicide. But he notes that other articles using Army STARRS data found that service members with relationship problems, such as a divorce or child custody battle, as well as those with legal troubles, could be at higher risk.

Many suicides after unplanned discharges

For their study, Riblet and her team reviewed VA clinical reports of death by suicide within seven days of discharge from all VA inpatient mental health units from 2002 to 2015. The reports looked, in part, at the root causes of the suicide. The study, which is expected to be published soon in The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, cites 141 reports of suicide during that period, 43 percent of which (61) followed an unplanned discharge. That means the discharge occurred against medical advice or the patient unexpectedly requested to move up the discharge after it was scheduled for a later time.

The study says inpatient teams should be aware of the “potentially heightened risk” for suicide in patients taking an unplanned discharge.

“Our findings suggest that even when—and especially when—patients leave inpatient psychiatric care precipitously or against our advice, we still need to do everything we can to arrange a solid follow-up plan,” she says. “This may require some continued work around follow-up planning and communication with patients in the hours and days following an unplanned discharge.”

Doctor Goodfield’s comment:

Whenever a patient, whether in a hospitalized setting or in an outpatient circumstance, makes the decision to unilaterally terminate the treatment process, it should be of major concern to the clinician. This is especially true when suicide is a topic in the treatment process. When suicide is being discussed as an alternative to an unsuccessful life experience, the clinician should give the patient additional attention and perhaps even additional sessions to address this thought process. This includes refocusing the treatment that they are getting and the reaction that they have to it.

When a veteran feels abandoned or on some level that his/her needs are not being met in the treatment they are receiving, they may simply choose to walk away in frustration and anger. Hopelessness or impotence may also lead to inappropriate solutions including giving up on life itself.

When the veteran feels they are overmedicated and perceive their therapist as uninvolved with their issues it is not hard to understand why the veteran might give up on the therapeutic process designed to give insight and alternatives to the problems that brought them to the VA in the first place.

It is not appropriate to chase the patient who appears suicidal. It is however, essential to express genuine concern. This must be followed by specific action to re-address the issue leading to the thought of terminating the treatment process before both agree that the process is over.

Suicidal patients are difficult to deal with and are often seen to be a heavy burden on the therapist. This is no excuse for not following a potentially suicidal patient who terminates therapy before it is officially over. But it certainly can explain why the therapist could become reluctant to reengage in a frustrating experience with someone who is as ambivalent and perhaps even passive aggressive as the one who left treatment.

The study says the risk for suicide may be the greatest in the first few days after discharge. VA/DoD clinical practice guidelines recommend a follow-up within seven days of discharge from hospitals and emergency rooms for patients who remain at high risk of suicide. The guidelines say the patients and family members should receive suicide-prevention information, such as a crisis hotline, as well as treatment plans for psychiatric conditions and for suicide-specific therapies.

But precautionary measures can only do so much. Riblet says in some cases a patient who dies by suicide may exhibit no warning signs prior to the incident. “Available instruments to help in the suicide risk assessment process are also not perfect, and no instrument can predict with absolute certainty who will die by suicide,”

In The Goodfield Method the client or patient is always given regular feedback with video analysis of their nonverbal behavior. This approach highlights deeper unconscious feelings of and to the client. In nearly all cases, strong indications of dissatisfaction in the treatment process are very apparent.

Moreover, this emotional exposure forms the basis for redirecting the therapeutic process to the causality and the need for redirection within the treatment process. When you’re observant and involved, the patient can always feel it. It is the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. This may lie at the heart of the veteran leaving therapy before the clinical work is complete.

The Goodfield Method’s Use of The Non-Verbal Leak (NVL) could provide an important opportunity for the clinician treating individuals who are seriously considering suicide. By definition, two emotions exist side by side: anxiety and ambivalence. Given these two variables, a clinician concerned about a high-risk of suicide with a  particular patient could ask that individual on video a few pointed questions that might elicit their true unconscious feelings about life and death. 

Suicide Prevention Using the Nonverbal Leak of The Goodfield Method™  The following are ten questions that could be used to determine risk factors with a potentially suicidal patient:

Question 1: How committed are you to your treatment?

Question 2: How effective do you feel the treatment that you’re currently receiving is in helping or hindering your recovery to fully functioning? 

Question 3: On a scale of one to 10, what number would you give to your level of progress in the treatment of your current condition, ten being best?

Question 4: What specifically do you need now to improve the possibility of a successful treatment program?

Question 5: How committed are you to continuing your life on the path it is currently on?

Question 6: What impact do you feel the medication that you are taking is having on your outlook on life; specifically, do you feel it is helping or hindering you? 

Question 7: State one thing that you feel would change your life for the better now, for example a change in your relationship with a person or an event? 

Question 8: Say your name.

Question 9: What do you see when you look at yourself saying your name? What do you see in your facial expression when you say your name? How does that feel? 

Question 10:  Say the name of someone important to you. What do you see when you say that persons name? How does that feel? 

Her research speculates that poor communication between providers may contribute to insufficient knowledge of a patient’s risk for suicide after discharge. “However, we do not know whether better risk assessment or provider communication would actually decrease post-discharge suicide risk,” she says. “This is an area where we need more research.”

They simply don’t see the value or the point of continuing. Sometimes this is a fatal conclusion as the statistics of twenty lost veterans a day indicates. Let me be clear: in no way do I cast aspersions on the men and women who dedicate their lives to helping our veterans. They are doing a difficult job with limited resources in an overwhelming circumstance. Day after day they bring help and hope to our veterans.

Three R’s for a Happier Memorial Day

The warm Arizona sky felt fresh on my skin as Dori and I sped down the empty freeway heading towards the 8 o’clock service at Pinnacle Peak Presbyterian Church. Top down and a seventy mile an hour breeze and the roar of the Morgan’s engine hearkened another beautiful day. By noon the temperature would be in the hundreds (+ 32 Celsius).

Dr. Wes Avram, the Minister gave a brilliant sermon about what we abstract from our life experience, what we remember and how it shapes our lives. He spoke of our veterans and the tormenting memories associated with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

It is a painful memory, a “gift” that keeps on taking, popping up out of nowhere when least expected. It is a landmine waiting to be triggered and exploded by a smell, sound, or quick movement. Always there — a matter of time waiting to destabilize, waiting to overwhelm a life that had been dedicated to service and to love of country.

Some suggest that such shocks can never be removed. After all, pain and trauma are part of life. Some of us had difficult childhood’s that impacted us in our adult life. We never forget some of those difficulties and obstacles.

For most of us early childhood traumas tint and taint the hues of our daily existence. For most of us they do not control our life they simply impacted our perception of life. When it becomes too much for us we try to talk it out with friends and family. If that is not successful we reach out to trained professionals and religious figures who can help us to understand our past and let it go.

In that sense on Memorial Day, when we say don’t forget to remember, we are ultimately suggesting that we keep in mind the acts and actions we deem as important from times past.

This Memorial Day weekend we focus our attention on those who have served our country and have made sacrifices for our freedom. What we must remember is that those who suffer from Post Traumatic Stress are trapped in that perpetual “Groundhog Day” film where events reoccur and then repeat and repeat it again.

There is a way out and there are thousands of professional men and women dedicated to defeating the cycle of sadness and despair. With years of training and experience this army of helpers strives to make the lives of our veterans better. Of this there is no doubt.

The question is what is the key to just stopping the “Post Traumatic Stress movie” that runs and ruins the lives of our veterans and their families? Here is my answer.

It is the 3Rs Reflection, Reasoning and Re-symbolization.

Reflection: To look back at difficulties and passed dangers provides us with opportunity to gain perspective and a greater understanding of past conflicts.

Reasoning: It’s one thing to look back and quite another to figure out how, why, where and when a trauma occurred. That becomes the basis for deeper understanding on both conscious and unconscious levels

Re-symbolization: Here’s where the magic comes in to play. Any healing process whether it be on a psychological, philosophical, theological or even a psycho­-physiological level must involve re-symbolization. On a psychological level it may be thought of as new insights. On a philosophical level it may mean embracing a more encompassing perspective. On a theological level it is generally thought of as forgiveness.

If you consider this notion of re-symbolization in general it is nothing more than letting go of something that disturbs our human balance. If it is as simple as that why don’t we just let go of those things that disturb us and quickly re-establish homeostasis or balance within our system whenever we need to?

It’s one thing to know that cigarettes aren’t good for you, it’s quite another to quit smoking. It’s one thing to know that a balanced diet is best for us it’s quite another to walk by a bakery or a candy store as if it were not there.

What makes re-symbolization so difficult? The answer is simple — it is our unconscious process. Things that are in our unconscious mind have two qualities.

  • They have a profound impact on the way we perceive events around us. The unconscious colors our perception and often determines our reality.
  • The unconscious is below our level of awareness. It is like the keel on a ship we do not see it but it has a profound impact on the stability of our ship of state — our lives.

If re-symbolization is an essential aspect of rebalancing our system how can we make it work? The answer is simple it is access. We can access the unconscious process through an altered state of consciousness. In other words, find the unique key for that particular trauma for that particular individual. It is as simple as decoding the messages that we send when the right questions are asked. These correct questions elicit responses from the unconscious that reflect the deep feelings that we have around critical issues. This is particularly true when trauma is associated with an issue.

We go to the dentist when we have a toothache to have it fixed. The first question usually relates to the reason for our visit. The answer is simple I feel pain. At that point we simply point our finger to the troubling area. The dentist looks and after explaining his diagnosis offers a treatment plan. It usually boils down to “I will fill or pull it”

The therapeutic process should be just the same. You find somebody qualified whom you can trust. Discuss the psychological pain you feel and what it is doing to you. The therapist like a psychological “safecracker” will access the content of your unconscious and help you to re-symbolize the meaning that you gave it at the first time and place when you experienced the trauma.

It is as complicated and simple as all that — access, insight and a new and more appropriate decision or simply re-symbolization. The message is shown by nonverbal behavior, what we call the NVL or Non-Verbal Leak. The Goodfield Method™ is the key to that precise access.

On Memorial Day we look to those who have made sacrifice and consider those still suffering from the traumas suffered that resulted in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). We must remember to remember and employ the new tools available to help our veterans to find a perspective that operationally lets them forget that which has controlled their lives in so many painful and destructive ways. There is an answer to PTSD and that is a deep insight and clear action.

After the service was over we went to the National Memorial Cemetery of Phoenix and walked among our military looking at the field of flags that flew honoring the lives they lived. The sun was getting hotter as we drove back in a self reflective silence.

Memorial Day was here as it is, every day for veterans. May God bless them all.

Prof. Barry Austin Goodfield, Ph.D., DABFM

Doctor Goodfield On Love and Loss

It seems to me, that real love is definitely not for those without courage. One of the things that I know to be true, is that risk taking is in direct proportion to growth. The more I am able to risk on life’s game of “pitch and toss” as Kipling said, the greater the possible winnings.

Throughout life we hear of great successes and failures experienced by sometimes extraordinary people in extraordinary circumstances. It is my belief that victory is a decision made prior to winning. It is simply the decision to pay more than the next guy to get what you really want.

We all have choice when it comes to what we want, and what we are willing to pay for what we want. Basically it is the price tag that goes with our needs and desires. Implicit in this choice is the notion of a price tag in relation to our investment. This is as true for the refrigerator that you decide to buy, as it is for the food you put in there.

Life is a quid pro quo attached to our daily living. There are those who for conscious and unconscious reasons choose to limit their investment in life’s big game. Those who approach life in this fashion often use value judgments as a kind of tool to rationalize their involvement and investment. Or lack of commitment in daily choices.

The formula is simple and ancient. It is the pleasure-pain principle. It ultimately boils down to the relationship between what you want, and what you’re willing to pay for it. Every day in life we are given the opportunity to choose how much we are going to invest. Not just in goods and services, but in the ultimate game of love and loss.

Real love is not for those without courage. When those unique moments in life are presented to us, and emotional investment is clear in relationship to our emotional need, we are confronted with real choice.

Here is a simple statement of that formula. How much do I have? What does it cost? What do I believe? What will I receive for my investment? Am I willing to pay the price?

This simple calculation relates to most all people and things in life. It is as true at the supermarket, as it is when shopping at Tiffany’s. As our parents taught us, you get what you pay for. And so it is, that there are those who are jealous when they look at what their neighbors have, and do not have.

What you have in your driveway, and what you have in your heart, relate to that simple formula I have just mentioned. What you’re willing to spend is in direct proportion to what you are able to receive.

Can it really be that simple?

It is in fact basically true. If this is the statement of the obvious, then why is it that we dance around this fact of life? I believe that the answer to the question basically relates to our personal experience with success and failure.

If we experienced repeated failure, with regard to our emotional investments, then by definition good judgment would suggest re-evaluation of our investment strategies. This is something that we do on both a conscious and unconscious level.

How many times we said, “I’ll never do that again!” or “I must have been stupid to get involved like that!” They are all learning points as we struggle to life. The paradox here is, that prudence is not necessarily the best guarantee of a positive outcome, when it comes to emotional investment. Risk taking is indeed in direct proportion to growth.

Unfortunately, it is in direct proportion to failure as well. So how does this relate to love and loss? In General Semantics we call this a polar term or a two valued term. If there is success there must be the notion of failure.

Just as if there is happiness, there must be the notion of unhappiness. As I said, it goes back to the pleasure-pain principle and the notion of cause and effect. I remind myself of this fact when I experience the pain of loss in my life. I am reminded of choice. If I decide to feel less pain, because I can’t stand the hurt, I am making the decision to invest less in others. Maybe because of my own fear of how much it will hurt, when I am confronted with their loss or absence in my life.

And so it really is a question of courage and pay off. It may even be thought of as an existential question. It is about as fundamental decision that we have choice. When I hear a person, whom I love dearly, experience the pain of loss I must ultimately reflect on my perception of their answer to this basic formula. Is this person a big game hunter in life? Or a cautious investor trying to have control risk
and limited failure?

Somehow, for me, I feel more empathy and involvement with those great risk-takers in life like the Winston Churchill’s, the Amelia Ehrhardt’s. Those for whom the formula of guts and glory dominate their life itself.

I must confess, I would rather experience the excruciating pain of loss. I guess there is no right or wrong here. If there is, it is the failure to realize that we have choice in this extraordinary decision about investment and involvement with life itself. I made the decision a long time ago, I want to live in the here and now, with all the hot and cold, sharp and soft, bitter and sweet that God gives me to experience. I reach out for love, with the clear knowledge that pain may follow.

My days are filled with deep laughter, genuine tears and the clear awareness that I live my life, and love those around me with all that’s in me.

To this I commit myself every day.

Doctor Goodfield’s Answer to ISIS

I have to confess something. I am not the person who can embrace the wisdom of the Bible, when Matthew says in 5:38-48 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.”

As a psychotherapist for more than 40 years, one of the overriding principles I have seen proven repeatedly is this simple truism: when you accept the unacceptable you reinforce it. This principle applies to us all, from cradle-to-grave.

Over the years, I have seen many people try to explain away the insanity of another by saying things like, “They didn’t mean itor “You have to put their behavior in a context.” Some people even go as far as to suggest, “You might do the same thing, if you lived in that situation.”

There are myriad of these remarks.

People rationalize in an attempt to explain away incomprehensible and irrational acts by others. In the ‘60s and ‘70s, I must confess, that I often quoted that great philosopher Willie Nelson when he said, “He ain’t wrong, he’s just different.”

Fuzzy thinking or an even fuzzier philosophy that suggests everything is a matter of perception or perspective misses the mark when we consider certain kinds of behavior.

I cannot imagine ever finding a global perspective that would allow me to forgive or forget anyone who would physically abuse or sexually molested a child. I have no forgiveness for some, whom I read about in the newspaper, that prey upon the weakness of others for their benefit as we saw depicted in the film the Wolf of Wall Street.

There are some things that are just simply wrong and moreover unacceptable! It’s not that they are “just different,” they are wrong.

As a therapist, I’ve been in the terrible situation of having to tell a child that he was going to die soon. Or trying to console a man facing years in prison for a crime, for which I believed he was innocent.

I tried to imagine what I would have said if I had to console Anwar Kasasbeh, the wife of the twenty-six year-old F16 Pilot Ft. Lieutenant Al-Kasasbeh, who was taken hostage in December, 2014 when he crashed in ISIS territory.

Moreover, what do you say to the family of the other hostage, Japan’s Kenji Goto, who was beheaded by ISIS. ISIS has publicly beheaded countless hostages to date. But would anyone doubt these were just the most publicize, and do not reflect the systematic barbarism that occurs daily? There is a fatal disease growing in our world body.

The diagnosis is clear, the prognosis is problematic unless direct action is taken. The question then becomes, how do you stop accepting this unacceptable behavior? Like many things I’ve seen over the years, here is another example of the answer being in the question. Stop accepting unacceptable behavior!

Jihadist threats have been tangible realities since they crawled out of the millennia of biblical times. They surface in shocking headlines too gruesome to be believed by a civilized society.

I am an American, and as such, I do not want to be dragged into a battle between two parts of the Muslim faith warring against each other in a fight that’s been going on for more than a thousand years.

ISIS slickly produced presentations of barbaric acts, worthy of a Hollywood award, does not make their insanity more understandable or rational.

I simply want them to go away and stop this behavior. I would encourage them to meet with those, with whom they have a difference, sit down and discuss those differences. And come to an amicable resolution without violence or irrational action.

I am convinced that this approach to conflict resolution is reasonable, rational, and unrealistic. I have negotiated situations when there where guns on the table or knives in people’s hands. I am not afraid of these situations. In all cases I was able to draw upon some level of rationality and even goodwill, which was often buried very deep.

Unfortunately, I am convinced that no such approach exists in a possible scenario that would stop the violence or end terrorism being inflicted upon us today.

The question is then, what is the answer to this spreading cancer?

I must return to my truism learned over the years, When you accept the unacceptable you reinforce it. I believe that it is time that we take the crisis and turn it into a creative solution.

Let me make myself perfectly clear here. The ISIS organization must be stamped out completely, totally and forever! To be more specific, it is foolhardy to believe that you can negotiate, communicate or do anything other than to capitulate or fight these savages!

Locking them up in mass or using any form of incarceration will only exacerbate the situation. It makes them the targets of those who would rescue them by additional ruthless means.

It must be seen as treating the disease that infects the world body today.

The sooner we understand this and accept this terrible challenge, the fewer lives will be lost. The less those, like Anwar Kasasbeh and her family, will struggle with trying to understand how one human being can behave like that towards another.

Here is what we need to do. A formal declaration of war needs to be stated. In that declaration the civilized countries of this world must, as they did in previous wars, denounce the unacceptable behavior as not befitting civilized people. Moreover, that declaration must follow with specific, decisive and direct actions to remove this blight from the surface of this earth.

What would this plan practically mean? First, there must be a call to action based upon a common acknowledgment of human rights and freedoms. These declarations have been around for centuries. The best example of it is the Constitution of the United States. They exist in the bastions of the capitals of civilized societies.

They don’t need to be dragged out and reread. They exist in the hearts and souls of freedom loving people in every land. They exist in the faces of children as they look to us for safety and solace of a parent’s promise.

ISIS is ultimately the fault of a Western political philosophy and foreign-policy. We fooled ourselves into believing that the Middle East conflict was a “tar baby” that would not stick, and ultimately engulf the West in its age-old struggles.

It’s time to form an international group specialized in removing “carcinogenic cells” led by real leaders such as British Prime Minister David Cameron, French President François Gérard Georges Hollande, King Abdullah II of Jordan to name a very few. Simply put, the American-led coalition needs a genuine leader. American or not, but someone who is not afraid to lead and take the direct action necessary to remove this scourge which threatens to engulf our planet.

Winston Churchill placed a red card upon documents that required immediate attention it simply said, ACTION THIS DAY. If there was ever a time in current history that required such a card and a bold person to place that card in front of the world councils, IT IS NOW!

To Mrs. Kasasbeh, I can only say what the civilized world is thinking today, I am terribly sorry for your loss. I can only hope that those in leadership positions throughout the world will use your terrible loss as a rallying cry for action. If we fail to act now, like any disease unattended, it will spread and kill even more.